DNSSEC Grounding Data for AI AgentsDNSSEC Grounding Data for AI Agents

OnlineCredit Usage:5 per callTool:DNSSECGroundingDataforAIAgents

The tool

Ground agents in real-time DNSSEC validation so domain-security answers reflect the live chain of trust, not cached assumptions.

Once your client is connected to the VerveContext MCP server, this appears in its tool list as DNSSECGroundingDataforAIAgents. It is read-only and open-world: it fetches, it never mutates anything on your side, so most clients will call it without asking you to confirm.

Tool call
{
  "name": "DNSSECGroundingDataforAIAgents",
  "arguments": {
    "domain": "cloudflare.com"
  }
}

What that looks like in a conversation

You don't name the tool — the model picks it. Asking about cloudflare.com in the terms this source covers is enough for it to reach for DNSSECGroundingDataforAIAgents on its own.

Connecting

One server URL covers every source in the catalog, including this one. Authorization is OAuth — the client opens a browser once and there is no key to paste into a config file.

Client config
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vervecontext": {
      "url": "https://api.vervecontext.com/v1/mcp"
    }
  }
}
Endpoint
https://api.vervecontext.com/v1/mcp

Per-client setup — Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, ChatGPT — is on the MCP setup page.

Arguments

These are the properties on the tool's inputSchema, so a well-behaved client validates them before the call is made.

ArgumentTypeExampleDescription
domainRequiredstringcloudflare.comThe domain name to check DNSSEC configuration for

What the model gets back

The result carries a structuredContent object matching the tool's declared outputSchema, so a client can read fields without parsing prose. status is "ok" on success and error is null; a null field means the value wasn't available for that input, not that the call failed.

Result
{
  "status": "ok",
  "error": null,
  "data": {
    "domain": "cloudflare.com",
    "dnssecEnabled": true,
    "valid": true,
    "records": {
      "dnskey": 3,
      "ds": 2,
      "nsec": "NSEC3"
    },
    "errors": [],
    "details": {
      "dnskeyCount": 3,
      "dsCount": 2
    },
    "status": "DNSSEC is properly configured with DS records at parent",
    "recommendation": "DNSSEC is properly configured",
    "riskScore": 5,
    "riskLevel": "low"
  }
}

Fields

Fields marked Premium need a paid plan. On a plan without them the key is absent rather than wrong, so a model never reasons over a substituted value.
FieldTypeExampleDescription
domainstringcloudflare.comDomain that was checked
dnssecEnabledbooleantrueWhether DNSSEC is enabled
validbooleantrueWhether DNSSEC configuration is valid
recordsPremiumobject{…}DNSKEY and DS record details
records.dnskeyPremiumnumber3Number of DNSKEY records published by the zone
records.dsPremiumnumber2Number of DS records held by the parent zone
records.nsecPremiumstringNSEC3Number of NSEC or NSEC3 records used to prove non-existence; null when none were returned
errorsarray[]Problems found in the chain of trust; empty when DNSSEC validates
detailsobject{…}Record counts behind the verdict
details.dnskeyCountnumber3Number of DNSKEY records seen
details.dsCountnumber2Number of DS records seen at the parent
statusstringDNSSEC is properly configured with DS records at parentPlain-language verdict on the domain's DNSSEC configuration
recommendationstringDNSSEC is properly configuredWhat to do about the current configuration
riskScorePremiumnumber5Composite 0-100 DNSSEC deployment-health score. A fully valid chain of trust scores low; a domain that published keys but never lodged its DS record at the parent zone (a broken chain that can break resolution) scores high; an undeployed domain scores in between
riskLevelPremiumstringlowRisk band derived from the score: low, medium or high

Why ground on it

A model can produce something that looks like this answer from its training data, and be confidently out of date or simply wrong. This source returns the current value with a shape you can check, which is the difference between an answer you can cite and one you have to hedge.

Point an evaluation at dnssecEnabled: it is the field most worth pinning a claim to, and it is either present and current or absent — never plausibly invented.

Failure modes

Errors come back as tool errors with a sentence the model can act on, not a bare status code.

StatusWhat it means
400 / 422The arguments didn't validate. The message names the offending one.
401The OAuth session is invalid or expired — reconnect the server.
403Out of credits. Not a bad key — the month's allowance is spent.
404This source isn't part of VerveContext. Check the catalog.
429Brief rate limit. Retrying after a moment succeeds.

Other ways to use DNSSEC Grounding Data for AI Agents

Set up DNSSEC Grounding Data for AI Agents on VerveContext, or reach the same source a different way. Your VerveContext account and credits work on all of them — one key, one balance.

Call it as a REST APIOne HTTPS endpoint and an X-API-Key header, with SDKs for Node, Python and .NET.APIVerveReference →
Give it to an AI agentConnect over MCP and your agent calls it as a native tool — Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT.VerveKitReference →
Use it in Google Sheets or ExcelA =VERVE() formula fills a column — no script, no export, recalculates in place.VerveSheetsReference →

Frequently asked questions

Do I have to tell the agent to use DNSSECGroundingDataforAIAgents?

No. The tool's name and description are in the model's context once the server is connected, so it selects the tool when the question calls for it. Naming it explicitly works too and is useful when you want to force the call.

Does connecting the server expose every tool at once?

Yes — one connection lists the whole VerveContext catalog. Clients with a tool budget can usually filter the list; the credit cost is per call, so an unused tool costs nothing.

What does a call cost?

5 credits each time the tool actually runs. A model that reasons about the tool without calling it costs nothing.

Is there a REST version of this?

Yes — the same source is available as a plain HTTPS endpoint on APIVerve, linked above. Same data, same credits, same account.

What's Next?

Continue your journey with these recommended resources

Was this page helpful?